- Home
- Finance History | Berkshire Hathaway | Operating Acquisitions and Industrial Platforms
- Finance History | Russell Corporation — The Vote Behind a Sportswear Platform
Finance History | Russell Corporation — The Vote Behind a Sportswear Platform
· 2006-8
Personal memoryBy kevin · · Report an issue
Find memories left by people near you.
Distribute Bounty
This will distribute the bounty equally among all qualifying memories. This action cannot be undone.
Cancel Bounty
Are you sure you want to cancel this bounty? The remaining amount will be refunded to your account.
Success!
Operation completed successfully.
Error
Something went wrong.
Finance History | Russell Corporation — The Vote Behind a Sportswear Platform
kevin
At 9:00 a.m. on August 1, 2006, Russell Corporation shareholders gathered at the Crowne Plaza Atlanta Perimeter NW Hotel at 6345 Powers Ferry Road to vote on the merger agreement that would place the century-old athletic-goods company inside Berkshire Hathaway.
The proxy statement required approval from holders of a majority of Russell’s outstanding common stock and reported 33,278,205 shares entitled to vote, turning an acquisition announced on April 17 at US$18.00 per share into a precisely dated corporate decision at a documented public venue.
Berkshire completed the acquisition the following day for approximately US$600 million in cash and also repaid about US$530 million of Russell term debt and revolving credit loans, while Buffett’s 2006 shareholder letter summarized the total commitment at roughly US$1.2 billion including assumed debt.
Russell brought brands spanning uniforms, apparel, sporting equipment, and footwear, including Russell Athletic, Jerzees, Spalding, and Brooks, and Berkshire placed the business with Fruit of the Loom rather than building a new oversight structure in Omaha.
Russell’s 2005 Form 10-K reported approximately US$1.4 billion of 2005 revenue, indicating that the vote transferred a sizable commercial platform rather than a narrow product label.
Buffett described the purchase as a tuck-in acquisition, a strategy that used managerial capability already inside Berkshire to absorb a large adjacent business, extend distribution and brand reach, and avoid treating every acquisition as a stand-alone headquarters problem.
The capital-allocation lesson is that size alone does not determine organizational treatment: a billion-dollar commitment could still be a tuck-in when the parent already possessed an operating platform able to supervise the assets, people, and brands being acquired.
The cover photograph shows a later Brooks Adrenaline GTS 18 running shoe, not the shareholder meeting; Brooks was one of the brands Russell named in its 2005 Form 10-K, and JSFarman’s product photograph is reused under CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons.
changes?
delete this memory?
We detected that you have a Blox in your crypto wallet! We will import the Blox into your account.
Click on done below to complete the import.
Welcome Back!
Sign in to preserve cherished moments
Don't have an account?
Welcome!!
Sign up and start preserving cherished moments
?
?
Choose your payment method
Buy with Metablox Credit
Do you want to mint Blox with Metablox Credit?
Which Crypto would you like to use?
Purchase Confirmed!
Your Blox is being minted on-chain and will appear in your profile shortly.
Log in or sign up to claim your Blox.
How many credits do you want to buy?
$100 USD = 1 Metablox Credit = 1 Blox.
Use Metablox Credit to mint any Blox you want on the map.
expand_more